IDR Logo

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://idr.iitbbs.ac.in/jspui/handle/2008/73
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChao S.-H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCho J.-S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKarki N.B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSahoo D.R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorYazdani N.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-13T05:19:08Z-
dc.date.available2020-01-13T05:19:08Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citation5en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://10.10.32.48:8080/jspui/handle/2008/73-
dc.description.abstractThe evaluation of the properties of FRC mixtures is of prime importance for these mixtures to be used effectively and economically in practice. Although currently there are various standards or testing methods for evaluation of the properties of FRC, there is no agreement on which standard is the best for a specific structural application. This can be a major reason that has inhibited the introduction of FRC into structural design code. This study investigated three major different material evaluation methods, i.e. uniaxial direct tensile test, third-point bending test, and round panel test, as well as behavior of specimens tested by the three methods. The advantages and limitations of those methods are discussed.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectASTM C1550en_US
dc.subjectASTM C1609en_US
dc.subjectFiber reinforced concreteen_US
dc.subjectResidual strengthen_US
dc.subjectShearen_US
dc.subjectUniaxial direct tensile testen_US
dc.titleFRC performance comparison: Uniaxial direct tensile test, third-point bending test, and round panel testen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
Appears in Collections:Research Publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.